Are Previous Joint Injuries Associated with Muscle Performance in Volleyball Athletes? (2024)

Original ArticleRev. bras. ortop. 58 (1) Jan-Feb2023https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1745801 linkcopy

    Abstract

    Objective The aim of the present study is to determine whether previous shoulder and knee injuries were associated with isokinetic fatigue index and agonist/antagonist ratio of shoulder internal/external rotators and knee flexors/extensors in male volleyball athletes.

    Methods The current study is a cross-sectional investigation of 49 male elite volleyball players competing at a high level in Brazil. Isokinetic fatigue index and agonist/antagonist profiles were assessed during the preseason. Additionally, in order to record previous injuries, the athletes answered a standardized questionnaire. We conducted a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to determine the association strength and the clinically relevant cut-off point for variables presenting statistical significance for the area under the curve (AUC) (α = 0.05). An independent t-test was used to compare isokinetic variables between athletes with and without previous injury (α = 0.05).

    Results The results of the ROC curve analysis indicated that hamstring fatigue index values at 300o/s were associated with the presence of previous knee injury (area under the curve [AUC] = 73%, p= 0.004), and shoulder external rotators fatigue index values at 360°/s were not associated with the presence of previous shoulder injury (AUC = 68%, p= 0.053).

    Conclusions Elite volleyball athletes who reported previous knee injuries were prone to a higher fatigue index than those reporting no injuries. Knee flexor resistance training might be useful for those athletes who reported knee injuries in the previous season.

    Keywordsknee injuries; muscle strength; shoulder injuries; volleyball

    Resumo

    Objetivo O objetivo deste estudo é determinar se lesões prévias de ombro e joelho estavam associadas ao índice de fadiga isocinética e razão agonista/antagonista dos rotadores internos/externos do ombro e flexores/extensores do joelho em jogadores de voleibol.

    Métodos Esta é uma investigação transversal com 49 jogadores de voleibol de elite que competem em alto nível no Brasil. O índice de fadiga isocinética e os perfis de agonistas/antagonistas foram avaliados durante a pré-temporada. Além disso, para registro de lesões anteriores, os atletas responderam a um questionário padronizado. Conduzimos uma análise da curva de característica de operação do receptor (receiver operating characteristic, ROC) para determinar a força de associação e o ponto de corte clinicamente relevante de variáveis com significância estatística na área sob a curva (AUC) (α = 0,05). Um teste t independente comparou as variáveis isocinéticas entre atletas com e sem lesão prévia (α = 0,05).

    Resultados Os resultados da análise da curva ROC indicam que os valores do índice de fadiga dos isquiotibiais a 300o/s foram associados à presença de lesão prévia no joelho (área soba a curva [AUC] = 73%, p= 0,004), enquanto os valores do índice de fadiga dos rotadores externos do ombro a 360°/s não foram associados à presença de lesão prévia no ombro (AUC = 68%, p= 0.053).

    Conclusões Atletas de voleibol de elite que relataram lesões anteriores no joelho estavam propensos a um índice de fadiga maior do que aqueles que não relataram lesões. O treinamento de resistência de flexores do joelho pode ser útil para atletas com relatos de lesões no joelho na temporada anterior.

    Palavras-chaveforça muscular; lesões do ombro; traumatismos do joelho; voleibol

    Introduction

    Bahr and Bahr1 reported a total volleyball injury incidence rate of 1.7 ± 0.2 per 1,000 hours of play. Shoulder and knee overuse injuries represent from 15 to 50% of all volleyball injuries.2 Verhagen and colleagues2 indicated that shoulder injuries account for the longest duration of time away from training and competition (6.2 weeks).

    Some authors investigated the relationship between muscle strength and overuse injuries in volleyball athletes.3-7 Commonly, these studies analyze the isokinetic torque or agonist/antagonist ratio and do not consider other parameters such as fatigue index. Suzuki and Endo8 evaluated the fatigability of the trunk muscles using the isokinetic dynamometer and found that patients with chronic low back pain had greater fatigue of the trunk flexors than healthy controls. Moreover, Souza and Powers9 evaluated muscle endurance of the hip extensors in females with and without patellofemoral pain (PFP) and observed 49% fewer hip extension repetitions in females with PFP.

    Muscle endurance (fatigue resistance) can be defined as the ability to produce work overtime or the ability to sustain effort.10 Fatigue combines physiological mechanisms occurring at the central and peripheral levels; it can affect afferent and efferent neuromuscular pathways, as evidenced by delayed muscle response.10 In volleyball, high-intensity efforts are often required for extended periods, and athlete fatigue is likely to occur. It seems feasible, therefore, that fatigue effects may compromise neuromuscular control responses to the point that abnormal and potentially hazardous movement strategies are inevitable.10,11 Additionally, muscle fatigue has been related to decreased performance (water polo) and lower limb malalignment.12,13 Therefore, volleyball athletes should participate in an assessment of shoulder and knee resistance to fatigue during preseason.

    Agonist/antagonist ratio, peak torque, and work are frequently studied; however, information about injury effects and muscle endurance after joint injuries is limited.14-17 Therefore, we aimed to verify whether previous shoulder and knee injuries were associated with isokinetic agonist/antagonist ratio and fatigue index of shoulder internal/external rotators and knee flexors/extensors in male volleyball athletes.

    Methods

    Forty-nine male elite volleyball players (mean ± standard deviation [SD] age, 21.96 ± 4.1) were recruited from 2 teams during the preseason. The inclusion criteria were participation on team schedule and no history of upper or lower extremity surgery during the previous year. Athletes who claimed shoulder or knee pain during the isokinetic test were excluded. All participants read and signed the informed consent form (Ethics Committee no 0493.0.203.000-09).

    The design of the study was observational research (cross-sectional).

    All eligible athletes filled out a questionnaire regarding previous and present shoulder and knee injuries. This questionnaire included information about anthropometric characteristics, sports practice, and injury mechanisms. We defined previous injuries as any physical complaint that led to sports practice absence before the current preseason assessment. Then, all athletes performed the knee isokinetic test, and, after a 1-day interval, they performed the shoulder isokinetic test.

    For the knee isokinetic assessment, the athletes performed a warm-up (5 minutes running) and were positioned at 85° hip flexion. Stabilizing straps were fixed on the pelvis, trunk, and thigh. The knee range of motion (ROM) was limited at 100°, starting at 110° knee flexion and finishing at 10° knee flexion.18 The hamstring (H) and quadriceps (Q) ratio was registered at 60°/s and 300°/s, and fatigue index at 300°/s for the dominant knee18 (Fig. 1a).

    Are Previous Joint Injuries Associated with Muscle Performance in Volleyball Athletes? (1)

    Fig. 1
    Knee and shoulder isokinetic assessment.

    On the 3rd day, the athletes were seated on the isokinetic chair, and the examiner positioned the dominant shoulder at 60° abduction, 30° horizontal adduction (scapular plane), and 90° elbow flexion19 (Fig. 1b). Stabilizing straps were fixed on the pelvis and trunk. Shoulder ROM was limited at 90°, starting at 50° shoulder internal rotation (IR) and finishing at 40° shoulder external rotation (ER), considering 0° as the forearm on horizontal position. The internal (IR) and external rotation (ER) ratio was collected at 60°/s and 360°/s, and fatigue index at 360°/s.19 Six athletes did not show up for the shoulder isokinetic assessment performed on the 2nd day of data collection (due to personal reasons). Therefore, 43 athletes (mean ± SD age 21.30 ± 4.19; height 1.96 ± 0.06, and body mass 89.98 ± 8.83) completed the shoulder isokinetic test.

    We performed descriptive statistics to characterize the sample. An independent t-test was used to compare the isokinetic variables between athletes with and without previous injury. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve used to determine a clinically relevant cut-off point for each isokinetic variable reached statistical significance for the area under the curve (AUC) (α = 0.05). The cut-off point was selected based on the largest distance from the reference line and sensitivity and specificity values. Prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to determine association strength.

    Results

    The data indicated 22 (44.90%) athletes had a previous knee injury and 29 (67.44%) had a previous shoulder injury. Table 1 indicates the characterization of all athletes included in our study.

    Table 1
    Preseason assessment data of all athletes (n = 57)

    Table 2 indicates a comparison of mean and SD values for isokinetic variables of knee and shoulder joint of athletes. No differences between the groups (with and without previous injury) were found.

    Table 3 shows the results of the ROC curve. Hamstring fatigue index values at 300 o/s were associated with the presence of previous knee injury (AUC = 73%). The cut-off point was 57.50 (sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 67%) for fatigue index of hamstrings at 300 o/s. Prevalence ratio values of 3.37 (95% CI = 1.34-8.50) were retrieved for hamstring fatigue index at 300o/s of ER.

    Table 3
    Receiver operating characteristics curve results

    Discussion

    The purpose of the present study was to verify whether previous shoulder and knee injuries were associated with isokinetic agonist/antagonist ratio and fatigue index of shoulder IR/ER and knee flexors/extensors in male volleyball athletes. For knee joint, the results showed that previous injury influenced hamstring fatigue. These data could contribute to the implementation of a specific strengthening program earlier in the preseason for volleyball athletes who presented previous knee injuries.

    Knee and shoulder injuries in volleyball players are related to long absences from sport.2 In the present study, 22 of 49 assessed athletes (44.90%) reported a previous knee injury. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the hamstring fatigue index was associated with the presence of previous knee injuries. Additionally, this is the first study to report a cut-off point for the hamstring fatigue index. Athletes with previous knee injuries had 237% more chance to display values above 57 of fatigue index. These results demonstrated a lower capability to maintain muscle performance of knee flexors during the isokinetic test. Some authors have demonstrated an association between fatigue and alterations in knee kinetic and kinematic.20-22 These alterations are frequently related to an increased risk of injury.7,11,21 Knee flexors participate in open-chain knee flexion, closed chain knee extension, ground reaction force absorption during landing, and energy generation for jumping.23,24 According to this clinical reasoning and our data, the evaluation of knee fatigue index should be included in the preseason assessment.

    The H/Q ratio at 60°/s and 300°/s was not different between athletes with and without knee injury history. The injured group had a ratio of 51.75, and the non-injured group had a ratio of 50.10. Despite the difference not being statistically significant, the H/Q in the present study is lower than in other studies. Hadzic et al.25 found a mean H/Q ratio of 61 at 60°/s in 127 volleyball players, and they reported that these values are in line with other sports. Volleyball athletes with patellar tendinopathy presented decreased hip extensors strength.26 The hamstring contributes to this movement within the gluteus maximus, mainly during closed kinetic chain and during landing, knee extensors and hip extensors act synergistically to dissipate the ground reaction force.27 In this sense, the presence of hamstring fatigue could increase the demand for knee extensors and predispose patellar tendon overload. Therefore, these findings reinforce the importance of strengthening knee flexor muscles during preseason.

    Twenty-nine of 43 (67.44%) athletes assessed reported previous shoulder injuries. Different from what we expected, there was no association between higher fatigue index for external rotator muscles and previous shoulder injuries. Tonin et al.28 found higher fatigability in symptomatic overhead athletes (volleyball and handball). Probably, the high fatigue index of external rotators could compromise the functional stability of the glenohumeral joint during spiking, since proper ER is necessary to avoid excessive humeral anterior translation.29,30 The differences reported for fatigue index may indicate that our assessed athletes had better ER muscle capacity. These results could also be partially confirmed by the equalized values found for the ER/IR ratio in comparison with other studies. In this sense, sports physiotherapists and strength conditioning trainers should focus on the maintenance of appropriate shoulder ER/IR ratio during the preseason.

    Similarly, the ER/IR ratios at 60°/s and 360°/s were not different between athletes with and without shoulder injury history. At 60°/s, the injured athletes had a 71.80% ratio, and the non-injured athletes had a 68.87% ratio. Stickley et al.7 and Hadzic et al.4 also found no statistically significant difference in the conc ER/conc IR ratio at 60°/s in female volleyball players with and without previous shoulder injuries.7 However, in male volleyball players, the ER/IR ratio was lower on the shoulder with the previous injury in comparison with the non-injured shoulder (0.57 × 0.61, p< 0.05).4 It is important to highlight that to prevent shoulder injury, this ratio has been reported to range from 66 to 75%.3 In this sense, in the present study, male athletes had a proper ER/IR ratio, differently from the male athletes from Hadzic's study, which had a lower ratio. Consequently, our findings support the recommendation that is necessary to balance the strength between ER and IR, and shoulder ER strengthening must be emphasized to keep the ER/IR ratio between 60 and 75%.

    This study has some limitations. The injury data was collected through self-reported questionnaires, and, therefore, memory bias could contribute to this matter. In view of this, the authors also chose to disregard information on the nature of injuries and previous rehabilitation, as these types of reports are less reliable and most prone to memory bias. Nevertheless, our results showed that previous knee injuries are associated with the hamstring fatigue index. Thus, in sports settings that do not have isokinetic tests, it could be recommended to include knee flexor resistance training for those athletes who reported knee injuries in the previous season.

    Practical Applications

    In the absence of isokinetic tests, we would recommend including knee flexor resistance training for those athletes who reported knee injuries in a previous season.

    Conclusion

    The results of the present study demonstrated an association between previous knee injury with hamstring fatigue index in male elite volleyball athletes. On the other hand, a shoulder injury in a previous season had no statistical differences on isokinetic variables on the next preseason assessment. Therefore, we recommend including the hamstring fatigue test and its specific resistance training during the preseason for athletes with previous knee injuries.

    • Financial Support

      There was no financial support from public, commercial, or non-profit sources.

    • *

      Work developed at Laboratório de Prevenção e Reabilitação de Lesões Esportivas (LAPREV), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.

    References

    • 1 Bahr R, Bahr IA. Incidence of acute volleyball injuries: a prospective cohort study of injury mechanisms and risk factors. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1997;7(03):166-171
    • 2 Verhagen EA, Van der Beek AJ, Bouter LM, Bahr RM, Van Mechelen W. A one season prospective cohort study of volleyball injuries. Br J Sports Med 2004;38(04):477-481
    • 3 Ellenbecker TS, Davies GJ. The application of isokinetics in testing and rehabilitation of the shoulder complex. J Athl Train 2000;35 (03):338-350
    • 4 Hadzic V, Sattler T, Veselko M, Markovic G, Dervisevic E. Strength asymmetry of the shoulders in elite volleyball players. J Athl Train 2014;49(03):338-344
    • 5 Wang HK, Cochrane T. Mobility impairment, muscle imbalance, muscle weakness, scapular asymmetry and shoulder injury in elite volleyball athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2001;41(03): 403-410
    • 6 Saccol MF, Almeida GP, de Souza VL. Anatomical glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and symmetric rotational strength in male and female young beach volleyball players. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2016;29:121-125
    • 7 Stickley CD, Hetzler RK, Freemyer BG, Kimura IF. Isokinetic peak torque ratios and shoulder injury history in adolescent female volleyball athletes. J Athl Train 2008;43(06):571-577
    • 8 Suzuki N, Endo S. A quantitative study of trunk muscle strength and fatigability in the low-back-pain syndrome. Spine 1983;8 (01):69-74
    • 9 Souza RB, Powers CM. Predictors of hip internal rotation during running: an evaluation of hip strength and femoral structure in women with and without patellofemoral pain. Am J Sports Med 2009;37(03):579-587
    • 10 McLean SG, Fellin RE, Suedekum N, Calabrese G, Passerallo A, Joy S. Impact of fatigue on gender-based high-risk landing strategies. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007;39(03):502-514
    • 11 Leppänen M, Pasanen K, Krosshaug T, et al. Sagittal Plane Hip, Knee, and Ankle Biomechanics and the Risk of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Prospective Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2017;5 (12):2325967117745487
    • 12 Carcia C, Eggen J, Shultz S. Hip-Abductor Fatigue, Frontal-Plane Landing Angle, and Excursion during a Drop Jump. J Sport Rehabil 2005;14(04):321-331
    • 13 Jacobs CA, Uhl TL, Mattacola CG, Shapiro R, Rayens WS. Hip abductor function and lower extremity landing kinematics: sex differences. J Athl Train 2007;42(01):76-83
    • 14 Rouis M, Coudrat L, Jaafar H, et al. Assessment of isokinetic knee strength in elite young female basketball players: correlation with vertical jump. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2015;55(12): 1502-1508
    • 15 Xaverova Z, Dirnberger J, Lehnert M, Belka J, Wagner H, Orechovska K. Isokinetic Strength Profile of Elite Female Handball Players. J Hum Kinet 2015;49:257-266
    • 16 Forthomme B, Wieczorek V, Frisch A, Crielaard JM, Croisier JL. Shoulder pain among high-level volleyball players and preseason features. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2013;45(10):1852-1860
    • 17 Tol JL, Hamilton B, Eirale C, Muxart P, Jacobsen P, Whiteley R. At return to play following hamstring injury the majority of professional football players have residual isokinetic deficits. Br J Sports Med 2014;48(18):1364-1369
    • 18 Bittencourt NFN, Amaral GM, Saldanha dos Anjos MT, D'Allessandro R, Silva AA, Fonseca ST. Avaliação muscular isocinética da articulação do joelho em atletas das seleções brasileiras infanto e juvenil de voleibol masculino. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2005;11(06): 331-336
    • 19 Mendonça LDM, Bittencourt NFN, Anjos MTS, Silva AA, Fonseca ST. Isokinetic muscular assessment of the shoulder joint in athletes from the male under-19 and under-21 Brazilian volleyball teams. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2010;16(02):107-111
    • 20 Kim Y, Youm C, Son M, Kim J, Lee M. The effect of knee flexor and extensor fatigue on shock absorption during cutting movements after a jump landing. Knee 2017;24(06):1342-1349
    • 21 Orishimo KF, Kremenic IJ. Effect of fatigue on single-leg hop landing biomechanics. J Appl Biomech 2006;22(04):245-254
    • 22 Briem K, Jónsdóttir KV, Árnason Á, Sveinsson Þ Effects of Sex and Fatigue on Biomechanical Measures During the Drop-Jump Task in Children. Orthop J Sports Med 2017;5(01):2325967116679640
    • 23 Shimokochi Y, Yong Lee S, Shultz SJ, Schmitz RJ. The relationships among sagittal-plane lower extremity moments: implications for landing strategy in anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention. J Athl Train 2009;44(01):33-38
    • 24 Leporace G, Praxedes J, Pereira GR, Chagas D, Pinto S, Batista LA. Ativação muscular do quadril e do joelho em duas aterrissagens realizadas por atletas do sexo masculino. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2011;17(05):324-328
    • 25 Hadzic V, Sattler T, Markovic G, Veselko M, Dervisevic E. The isokinetic strength profile of quadriceps and hamstrings in elite volleyball players. Isokinet Exerc Sci 2010;18(01):31-37
    • 26 Scattone Silva R, Nakagawa TH, Ferreira AL, Garcia LC, Santos JE, Serrão FV. Lower limb strength and flexibility in athletes with and without patellar tendinopathy. Phys Ther Sport 2016;20:19-25
    • 27 Scattone Silva R, Ferreira AL, Nakagawa TH, Santos JE, Serrão FV. Rehabilitation of Patellar Tendinopathy Using Hip Extensor Strengthening and Landing-Strategy Modification: Case Report With 6-Month Follow-up. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2015;45(11): 899-909
    • 28 Tonin K, Stražar K, Burger H, Vidmar G. Adaptive changes in the dominant shoulders of female professional overhead athletes: mutual association and relation to shoulder injury. Int J Rehabil Res 2013;36(03):228-235
    • 29 Rathi S, Taylor NF, Green RA. The effect of in vivo rotator cuff muscle contraction on glenohumeral joint translation: An ultrasonographic and electromyographic study. J Biomech 2016;49 (16):3840-3847
    • 30 Lee SB, Kim KJ, O'Driscoll SW, Morrey BF, An KN. Dynamic glenohumeral stability provided by the rotator cuff muscles in the mid-range and end-range of motion. A study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82(06):849-857

    Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      12May2023
    • Date of issue
      Jan-Feb2023

    History

    • Received
      28July2021
    • Accepted
      07Feb2022
    Authorship

    Natália F. N. Bittencourt

    Laboratory for the Prevention and Rehabilitation of Sports Injuries (LAPREV), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Giovanna M. Amaral

    Laboratory for the Prevention and Rehabilitation of Sports Injuries (LAPREV), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Alysson L. Zuin

    SADA Cruzeiro, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Rodrigo de O. Mascarenhas

    Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, MG, Brazil

    Anderson A. Silva

    Department of Physiotherapy, Univerisdade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Hytalo de J. Silva

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal dos Vales de Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, MG, Brazil

    Luciana D. Mendonça Address for correspondence Luciana De Michelis Mendonça, PT, ScD, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Department of Physical Therapy, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil (e-mail: lucianademichelis@yahoo.com.br).

    Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, MG, Brazil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal dos Vales de Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, MG, Brazil

    Address for correspondence Luciana De Michelis Mendonça, PT, ScD, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Department of Physical Therapy, Diamantina, Minas Gerais, Brazil (e-mail: lucianademichelis@yahoo.com.br).

    Conflict of Interests

    The authors have no conflict of interests to declare.

    SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

    Laboratory for the Prevention and Rehabilitation of Sports Injuries (LAPREV), Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    SADA Cruzeiro, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Department of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, MG, Brazil

    Department of Physiotherapy, Univerisdade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil

    Postgraduate Program in Rehabilitation and Functional Performance, Universidade Federal dos Vales de Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (UFVJM), Diamantina, MG, Brazil

    Figures | Tables
    • Figures (1)
    • Tables (3)

    Fig. 1
    Knee and shoulder isokinetic assessment.

    Table 1
    Preseason assessment data of all athletes (n = 57)

    Table 2
    Comparison between athletes with and without previous injury

    Table 3
    Receiver operating characteristics curve results

    imageFig. 1 Knee and shoulder isokinetic assessment. open_in_new

    Are Previous Joint Injuries Associated with Muscle Performance in Volleyball Athletes? (4)

    table_chartTable 1 Preseason assessment data of all athletes (n = 57)
    Demographics Mean (SD) Min-Max
    Age (years) 21.96 (4.16) 17-33
    Body mass (Kg) 89.17 (9.03) 68-106
    Height (m) 1.96 (0.06) 1.77-2.08
      Abbreviation: SD, standard deviation.
    table_chartTable 2 Comparison between athletes with and without previous injury
    Knee joint With previous injury Without previous injury P-value
    Fatigue flex 300 o/s 62.46 (6.02) 55.66 (9.29) 0.12
    Fatigue ext 300 o/s 47.67 (10.27) 47.88 (7.25) 0.52
    H/Q ratio 60°/s 51.75 (5.72) 50.10 (7.85) 0.44
    H/Q ratio 300°/s 65.81 (11.15) 63.14 (9.80) 0.42
    Shoulder joint With previous injury Without previous injury P-value
    Fatigue ER 360 o/s 52.25 (25.73) 38.14 (14.75) 0.09
    Fatigue IR 360 o/s 32.56 (17.25) 42.48 (12.98) 0.15
    ER/IR Ratio 60°/s 71.80 (14.52) 67.87 (16.28) 0.64
    ER/IR Ratio 360°/s 57.88 (19.50) 62.60 (20.50) 0.78
      Abbreviations: ER, external rotation; H/Q, ; IR, internal rotation.
    table_chartTable 3 Receiver operating characteristics curve results
    Knee joint AUC 95% CI P-value
    Fatigue Fl 300 o/s 0.739 0.59-0.88 0.004*
    Fatigue ex 300o/s 0.524 0.35-0.69 0.77
    H/Q ratio 60°/s 0.625 0.44-0.80 0.17
    H/Q ratio 300°/s 0.544 0.36-0.72 0.62
    Shoulder joint AUC 95% CI P-value
    Fatigue ER 360 o/s 0.683 0.52-0.84 0.053
    Fatigue IR 360 o/s 0.352 0.19-0.51 0.12
    ER/IR ratio 60°/s 0.603 0.41-0.79 0.27
    ER/IR ratio 360°/s 0.432 0.24-0.62 0.47
      Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; CI, confidence interval; ER, external rotation; H/Q, ; IR, internal rotation.
    How to cite
    Are Previous Joint Injuries Associated with Muscle Performance in Volleyball Athletes? (2024)

    FAQs

    Why are knee injuries common in volleyball? ›

    The knee is the most frequent site of injury in volleyball players. More than 40% of high level players suffer overuse injuries during this activity; this particularly painful syndrome is caused by the amount of jumping typical in volleyball play, and in its training which aims at strengthening the quadriceps muscle.

    How common are ACL tears in volleyball? ›

    Softball 11.4%, Volleyball 8.8%

    Here are the stats on ACL injuries in volleyball and softball: Among young female high school athletes, 11.4% tore their ACL playing softball. Among young female high school athletes, 8.8% tore their ACL playing volleyball.

    How often do injuries occur in volleyball? ›

    Common mechanisms for injury in volleyball include contact with another player, often when a player lands on another player's foot after the execution of a jump. Overall, injuries in volleyball practice and games occur at a rate of 1 to 10 injuries for every 1,000 hours of play.

    What are the potential injuries in volleyball? ›

    Some of the most common volleyball injuries that occur in volleyball include: Shoulder injuries — Constant use of the arms can cause volleyball players to suffer from: Shoulder irritation and inflammation, specifically in the rotator cuff muscles. Rotator cuff tendonitis or tears.

    What is the most injured joint in sports? ›

    The majority of sports injuries involve the lower body, particularly knee injuries. One of the most common knee injuries is called patellofemoral syndrome.

    Why is the knee the most injured joint? ›

    Your knee joint connects the long bones of your legs, joining your thigh bone to your shin bone, allowing you to bend and twist in a variety of motions. Your knee joint carries the whole weight of your upper body, one of the reasons why knees are so vulnerable to illness and wear-and-tear.

    Which sport has the highest risk of ACL injury? ›

    The Riskiest Sports. Nationally, athletes are most likely to injure their ACL playing soccer than any other sport. “Soccer players cannot predictably plant their foot because they're getting jostled by an opponent while turning for the ball.

    Why are ankle injuries so common in volleyball? ›

    Risk factors that increase potential for injury:

    61% of all ankle sprains occur at the front row/net zone with majority during contact with team mate or opponent while landing on their foot during spiking/blocking. other non-contact injuries occur with landing or stepping wrong after jumping or reaching.

    How to prevent ACL tears in volleyball? ›

    Avoiding ACL tears
    1. Jump, land, stop, and move with your knees directly over your feet.
    2. Never let your knees collapse inward.
    3. Develop strength in your hips and thighs.
    4. Warm up and stretch before games and practice.
    Feb 7, 2023

    What volleyball position gets injured the most? ›

    Front-row positions and attempts to block the ball are most often associated with injuries compared with the back-row positions and other attempted manoeuvres. Overuse injuries far outstrip acute injuries in terms of frequency and appear to be related both to repetitive use and to technique errors.

    How many times a week should you practice volleyball? ›

    Most volleyball athletes are practicing anywhere from 3-6 days per week, sometimes twice a day. In each practice, they could get anywhere from 100-125 jump contacts, each with an accompanying high-velocity arm swing. Most jump contacts are bilateral and plyometric in nature.

    Are Broken fingers common in volleyball? ›

    The most common body parts injured were fingers (43.0%), wrists (22.8%), and shoulders (12.2%). The most common identifiable mechanisms of injury were impacts with the floor (19.4%), impacts with the ball (14.7%), and spikes/serves (5.7%). Most common diagnoses were strains/sprains (42.6%) and fractures (19.5%).

    Are back injuries common in volleyball? ›

    Although volleyball is a relatively safe sport compared to other high contact, collision sports, it does lend itself to unique injury patterns; particularly overuse injuries of the knee, shoulder and back.

    What is the top volleyball injury? ›

    Ankle sprains are most common injury. Many players have sprained both ankles several times. Sprained fingers are also common, but these injuries are usually mild, allowing for the player to resume training fairly quickly.

    Why do my knees hurt when playing volleyball? ›

    Knee injuries

    The nature of volleyball requires repetitive explosive jumping, which places a lot of stress on the patellar tendon, resulting in pain in this area. At some point, approximately half of volleyball athletes develop patellar tendinitis, known to many as “jumper's knee”.

    What sport causes the most knee injuries? ›

    Certain sports, such as running, football, basketball, lacrosse or skiing, have increased risk of knee joint injury because of the harsh moves inherent to the sport. Sudden stops, twists and turns or the pressure put on the knee joint while running can cause knee pain or injury.

    Why are knees so susceptible to sports injuries? ›

    These rubbery structures (the meniscus) provide a natural cushion between the two bones and help stabilize the joint. Held together by a collection of ligaments that connect bone to bone and tendons that attach muscle to bone, the knees are the most easily injured joints in the body.

    What sports have the highest knee injury rates? ›

    Causes. ACL injury typically occurs during athletics where jumping, pivoting and rapid change of direction occurs. Football, basketball, lacrosse, soccer, and skiing are some sports known to have high ACL injury rates.

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Tish Haag

    Last Updated:

    Views: 5753

    Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

    Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Tish Haag

    Birthday: 1999-11-18

    Address: 30256 Tara Expressway, Kutchburgh, VT 92892-0078

    Phone: +4215847628708

    Job: Internal Consulting Engineer

    Hobby: Roller skating, Roller skating, Kayaking, Flying, Graffiti, Ghost hunting, scrapbook

    Introduction: My name is Tish Haag, I am a excited, delightful, curious, beautiful, agreeable, enchanting, fancy person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.